The NBA Uncovers DSS lies
The lies DSS told to justify raid on judges, by NBA
The lies DSS told to justify raid on judges, by NBA
The Nigerian Bar Association, NBA, Thursday, faulted claims by the Department of State Services that there were complaints or petitions against the judges arrested in a sweeping operation on Friday night and the early hours of Saturday.
Specifically, the NBA said there is no record of any complaint against the two Supreme Court Justices, Sylvester Ngwuta and John Okoro, who were arrested in the night raid by the DSS, describing their arrest as “unconstitutional and clearly outside the mandate of the Service.”
According to the NBA President, Mr. Abubakar Mahmoud (SAN), who addressed a press conference in Abuja on Thursday, contrary to the claim by the DSS, the two judges of the apex court, Justices Sylvester Ngwuta and John Okoro, were never invited and there was no formal complaint against them before their homes were raided.
He said: “We have engaged with the NJC and there was no evidence that has been made available to us that suggests that the two justices of the Supreme Court were ever invited or, if, indeed, there was any complaint by anybody against them.
“This is the information we got from the NJC and we don’t have any reason to doubt it. So, where no complaint has been made either by the DSS or by other citizens before this sort of very drastic measures were taken, we do not see any justification for that.
“The Supreme Court and, indeed, other superior courts in Nigeria are part of the judicial institutions of this country and we cannot denigrate them under the guise that we are fighting corruption.
“We must not destroy the institution or expose it to ridicule or disdain and humiliation both locally and internationally because of the allegations against them.
“But in this case, especially in the case of the two justices of the Supreme Court, we have been informed that there was no formal complaints against any of the two before this action was taken.
“With respect to the other five, we have been informed that at least cases of four of them have been dealt with by the NJC and they are being recommended for various disciplinary measures, both to the President and their various governors; and it is not the responsibility of the NJC to remove them as recommended by the NJC.
“The fifth case was pending before the NJC as of the time of this invasion. So, we do not see reason why this sort of military style approach should be adopted in respect of cases that have already been dealt with and disciplinary measures recommended.”
Comments
Post a Comment